Three Personality Types: clarks, scotts and rogers

By clarkscottroger

don’t tell me, show me these types

Still not sure?

If the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers) is to be anything it will be a mirror and we all know what people do with mirrors.

…they look.
They look to see if the mirror shows what they think it should show…
They look to see if what we think we are shows…

But before we get too metaphysical, even though a clark will avoid the image in the mirror and a scott will be startled and bark at it and a roger will stop and stay, let us agree to try and stay on topic.

For starters, we will find images of clarks, scotts and rogers from the real world. In the first case a video clip.

Following is an example of both a clark and a scott, acting characteristically. Can you tell which is which? (Hint: clark will show himself by his words, scott by his actions.)

This one little 2 minute video clip speaks volumes. If (after watching this clip), you still don’t know what we mean by  scottian and clarklike personalities, then this blog might be a bit beyond your reach. (Hey, there are tons of ’tell me what kind of animal I would be!!‘ websites out there. Have fun).

In the above clip, the scottian personality may seem easy (and obvious) to understand, while it is almost irresistibly tempting to over-simplify; the useful information of this example is not about Nicky attacking the guy with the pen. Rather consider the Clark in this clip and the relationship between the two characters.

DeNiro’s character (Ace) says it all in the voiceover line, ‘While I was still trying to figure out why…Nicky hit him…’

The easy part: scotts react with action, usually in the form of overwhelming force. clarks think. The character says it. He was still thinking and the threat had been eliminated. It is not about the clark being unable to act, it is about the perceptual bias.

clarks think, scotts act (rogers feel).

The hard part: the relationship of the two characters here. There is an inter-dependency (symbiotic to use a rogerian phrase). One needs the other, one complements the other.


Now let us consider rogers: following is a clip from the movie ‘Wolf’ that shows us an interaction between a scott and a roger.

Click on the link below (Wolf- “I’m Gonne Get You, Stewart“) that will take you to a scene from the movie ‘Wolf’. (Quick back-story: Will (Jack Nicholson) is an established editor in a publishing house that is about to get sold and Stewart (James Spader) is a young, ambitious editor who convinces the owner of the company that the way of the future is to get rid of the old and let the young be in charge). This is a classic scenario for conflict between roger and a scott.

(“All right, class, settle down. Scott get back in your seat, leave the food alone.”) Besides showing the way a roger might attempt to defend himself from a scott, this video clip is a very good illustration of the eyes (of the scott).

When looking to identify a scott, the person’s eyes will do. The eyes of a scott are unmistakable. The scott (being a predator) is always ‘on the look out’ for threats/food.

The expression ‘steely gaze’ is appropriate to a scott. There is an alertness, an attentiveness, a focus that is always on guard. Look (in the scene) at the difference between the eyes of the scott and the roger.

In the above movie scene, Will knows what is important and his eyes never leave Stewart.

Stewart, on the other hand, is ‘bobbing and weaving.’ He knows he is outmatched. He knows he is the prey in a predator/prey situation. And even though the ultimate outcome is never in doubt, rogers are not passive. At least not entirely. Let’s consider the question: when we realize that we are being threatened, how do we respond?

Here the roger (Stewart) knows he is in trouble, so he goes to his strengths.

Though, as a roger, Stewart is a food group for the scottian Will, he puts up a fight the only way that makes sense. He tries to socialize.

Listen to what he says: ’I love you’

(Jesus Christ, he did say that) Because that is the world that the roger lives in. A world grounded in, framed in, established in: emotion.

At the same time watch Stewart’s eyes. He knows he is in trouble and is desperate to find a way out. You can see the calculation that is going on in his head as the situation leaves his control.

There is no fight in fight or flight for Stewart. He will run if he can, but the best he can do is try to appeal to Will’s social side.

Good luck with that

This entry was posted in Personality Types, Psychology, Relationships and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Three Personality Types: clarks, scotts and rogers

  1. tell them stuff that they should know but are afraid to know…that’ll get their attention

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s