If you’re a scott (the most outrageous and fun personality type of the three) you’ll leave a comment damnit. Come on. I dare you.

We know why you are reluctant to Comment

August 31, 2010 Byclarkscottroger

Ok people here’s the deal. If you want to read the entire post from the

Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers)be my guest. Where’s the link? Right at the beginning up above there nimrod. In big blue letters. Geez… Or if you prefer I’ll give you the cliff notes version. (I gotta remember to start off nice).

We have quite a following here at the Doctrine. How do we know this? Because we can see you all visiting that’s why. So the big question: What the fuck is so hard about leaving a comment or two. You know you want to or you wouldn’t still be re-visiting. I mean what the hell?

Oh, you’re afraid you’ll sound stupid. Well here’s a thought Mr./Mrs/Ms. Stupid. Since you’ve been following us for so long now you must be at least somewhat comfortable with our theory. Aren’t you curious if you have decided correctly which of the three you are? Remember, we all have each of the three in us. It is the predominance of that determines who you are.

Look, when I first started reading the Doctrine and learning about the three types I thought I was a roger. After a few comments and questions I was enlightened to the fact that I was a scott. It all made sense. And let me tell you, scotts are the fuckin’ bomb. But I digress.

So come on. Stop agonizing over knowing “who” you are. If you’re not sure write a comment or question and we’ll be glad to oblige. And if, at this point, you feel comfortable with this personality type theory we’ve got going on then certainly it wouldn’t hurt to share you opinion.

Enough pleasantries. Get out a fuckin’ pen and piece of paper. Jot down all of the things you’d like to know more about or questions you have. Just do it. This isn’t a damn quiz.

We can even give you more insight to the clarks, scotts and rogers by having a gander at their stuff. Go ahead on over to the emotional one and that oh so eclectic thinker and come back and tell me who is a clark, who’s a scott (duh-you‘re reading the scotts blog ding-dong) and who is a roger. I could scream at you until my face turns blue. But these links will be surprisingly helpful in determining who’s who.

So get your asses over there, come back and let me know your findings. Shit, you might even qualify for a hat (for your damn head). We’re even working on t-shirts. How cool would that be? Now get along and come back. No, you don’t have to have “credentials.” Which brings me to another benefit of the Doctrine. But that’s another post entirely. Watch for it in the coming days. OK, off you go.

Oh yeah, one more thing. See those comments below? How difficult can it be? Shit you could probably top ‘em. So let’s get with the fucking program.

We want to hear from you is all. The good, the bad, the ugly (of course as it pertains to the Doctrine knuckleheads).  So just leave a frickin’ comment over at the Doctrine.

Comments

AKH says:

August 31, 2010 at 11:18 am

Welcome Germany! I see that you have just “arrived.” Let’s hear what you have to say. Really. What is it that keeps drawing you back here? We would love to hear a comment from you. Don’t be shy, just write what’s going through your head at the moment as you read the Wakefield Doctrine. Love it, hate it, just curious? By the way, how the heck did you find us?

AKH says:

August 31, 2010 at 11:49 am

Bonjour la France! Qu’est-ce qui arrive ? Joli vous voir de nouveau. Que haveth vous pour dire ?

AKH says:

August 31, 2010 at 11:55 am

Oh yeah, and we can’t forget about you Studley (the UK). We are happy to see that you are a somewhat regular reader too (no, of course we’re not spying on you – take a look on the right at “Live Feed”.) But regrettably we have yet to hear from you. What’s going on across the pond? And I promise Glenn won’t say anything obnoxious about the name Studley. He’s just being a typical in your face, let’s make a joke at someone else’s expense, scottian self. Right Glenn? Play nice.

Downspring#1 says:

August 31, 2010 at 9:01 pm

An example of the theory of clarks, scotts and rogers from your timeshare days would/could be instructional. Perhaps begin with the resident scott(s).  (I find them easiest to identify.)

AKH says:

September 3, 2010 at 1:10 pm

(…now lets try to remember this right…)(…the note from AKH was totally explicit {no scott there, huh?} {{lol}}….anyway supposed  to move one of these to another spot…(damn! think this supposed to go here..)

(Better make it look on purpose!…)

If you would all help Ms AKH welcome a new Reader! Ms AKH? Take it from here…

I’m excited to announce that we have a new reader/follower to the Wakefield Doctrine (the theory of …) Let’s give CY a nice warm welcome! She is the newest self-proclaimed clark.
We look forward to hearing from you CY!